Thursday, May 22, 2008

No Fuel Here For E-85 Vehicles

Melissa Baugher is forced to buy gasoline for lack of ethanol

By Nao Braverman
Concerns about global warming and soaring gas prices have drawn ample attention to the variety of alternative fuel vehicles now on the market.
Consumers can chose between a hybrid, a bio-diesel engine, or a car that runs on ethanol. But if you live and drive in Ojai, you probably shouldn’t choose the latter, unless you know how to make moonshine in your basement.
Ojai resident Melissa Baugher could tell you why. She purchased an E-85 compatible Chevrolet Tahoe, about a year ago, but has yet to fill it with anything but gas.
That’s because there isn’t any ethanol around, unless you want to drive all the way to Los Angeles. And then you’ve already spent $30 just to get there and back, she said.
Baugher had read about ethanol-compatible vehicles on the internet and was concerned about rising fuel costs. So when she bought her Tahoe for about $35,000, she readily paid an extra $4,000 for an active fuel management system, and E-85 compatibility.
At the time, ethanol was still slightly more expensive than gas. But it is supposed to get better mileage, and is better for the engine, she said. Baugher was happy to get the car that she wanted, which had lower fuel costs than other SUVs.
What the car dealer at Paradise Chevrolet in Ventura didn’t tell her was that the closest ethanol pump was in Brentwood.
“If I drove to L.A more often it might be useful, but I live and work in Ojai,” said Baugher.
While ethanol pumps have spread rapidly in the Midwest, there are still only 10 fueling stations in California that have ethanol. Most of them, unfortunately for Baugher, are currently split between the San Diego area and the northern part of the state.
A Paradise Chevrolet salesman told the Ojai Valley News that ethanol service stations would soon be heading toward Ventura County. But recent controversy over ethanol’s environmental impact might decrease the likelihood of that happening anytime soon.
Media coverage of the negative consequences of producing the alcohol-based fuel has tempered the ethanol boom. Critics of ethanol say that increased ethanol production in the United States has contributed to food shortages and rising food costs by using so much corn. Some experts say that ethanol refineries are actually raising smog levels in the areas where they are most prominent, according to an Associated Press article.
Brazil’s sugar cane-based ethanol industry, one of the largest in the world, is contributing to deforestation as more trees are being cut down to make room for sugar cane fields.
Investors who bought into the industry are getting less returns than they had hoped for, according to an Associated Press article.
Still, for those who live or work close enough to an ethanol pump, E-85, which was once a little more expensive than gas, is now a little cheaper, thanks to rising costs of petroleum.
At the Conserv Fuel station in Brentwood, ethanol is $3.59 at the pump while gas has gone up to $3.97. But it would take a while to make up the extra $4,000 that Baugher paid on her car for flex-fuel compatibility, or even with the current extra charge, which has gone down to $2,000 at Paradise Chevrolet.
Local residents should be duly warned; car dealers might be getting a bit ahead of themselves. A salesman at the Ventura-based Chevrolet dealer still touts the benefits of flex-fuel Tahoes without mentioning outright that there are still no E-85 pumps available to the public in the entire county.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is the joke that writes itself.

Anonymous said...

Lives and works in Ojai, but needs a Tahoe. I'm laughing

Anonymous said...

I live and work (own a business) in Ojai. I drive a full size Blazer. Why is that laughable?

B Dawson

Anonymous said...

I am getting a moped to drive. It was 150.00 to fill up my suv. OUCH

Anonymous said...

B Dawson, I have always been pretty impressed by the sense you make in your blogs, but this one is totally senseless. Why, unless you are hauling a cub scout pack, would you need to drive a full sized Blazer from Siete Robles to Canada Street? I assume Ms. Bauger is hauling a pack of SOMETHING as well. Why does any one single or even two people commuting ANYWHERE need anything that big? And I am SHOCKED Ms. Baugher was not embarrassed to admit the first question out of her mouth when she went shopping for this boat was WHERE DO I BUY THE ETHANOL?

Anonymous said...

Actually, I do have a bit to haul around. Large dogs need to be taken to the vet, I do lots of construction projects around the house requiring lumber, bags of mulch and plants. I regularly do deliveries to customers, especially those who have small cars and can't take home the cat furniture they just purchased. I long ago lost the yoga-like flexibility needed to fold my frame up into a sub-compact.

For the record, I use about one tank of gas or less a month (the tank holds 30 gallons). I often commute in a GEM, although it has proven less reliable than I had hoped. In addition, I will have to dispose of the GEM's batteries when their life is expended - an environmental compromise that I consider only slightly better than burning fossel fuel.

SUV's serve a purpose for some people and can be driven responsibly. Being environmentally responsible is about the big picture, not judging by a single component in a person's life. Besides, who do you think gets the call when the folks with 4 cylinders need to move, bring home bulky items or need a trailer full of something moved?

While biofuels may offer a small part of the solution, I believe they will not be the salvation some want to make them out to be. The NY Times just did an interesting article on the invasive nature of many of the non-native plants used instead of corn to make ethanol. Hopefully, we won't create an environmental disaster of a different sort in to find a solution to foreign oil.

B Dawson

Anonymous said...

Thank you, B, for expounding. NOW you make sense. I was disappointed in your first blog. I knew there was something not being said. I long ago lost my mind-reading capability. Like I said, you usually are right on with your comments.

So, Ms Baugher, let us know why you did not ask the BIG question when you went boat, I mean, car, shopping

Anonymous said...

I have to admit that I would have asked about fuel availability prior to purchasing a new technology, but why does anyone have to defend their choice of a car?

My anonymous questioner obviously knows where I live and where I work but was still oblivious of my lifestyle, making the judgement that the only possible use for my truck was my commute to work. I thank you for admitting that my lifestyle justifies my driving my Blazer.

Under these guidelines, a Prius owner is thereby justified in questioning the purchase and right to drive a midsize non-hybrid car as an excess. Of course the Prius has lost ground with the import of the Smart Car, whose owners now have bragging rights, I suppose. This is the truly laughable thing here!

The person with a small car may make dozens of trips back and forth through town daily. The person with the SUV may live in a solar home. We have no way of knowing. In the end, is it really any of our business?

All each of us can do is live our own lives as environmentally as we see fit and hope that others make the wisest decisions they can make, or afford for that matter. Many "green" products don't come cheaply.

B Dawson

Anonymous said...

I too thought it a bit odd that someone would go to all of the trouble to go so far as to purchase an auto that uses e-85 and not ask where one could buy the stuff. It was a nice idea, she just did not do her homework. And also the salesman should feel ashamed of himself for taking advantage of this woman. He saw her coming from a really long ways off.